Using the Full Spectrum for Raman: From UV to NIR - - Spectroscopy
 Home   Mass Spectrometry   ICP-MS   Infrared   FT-IR   UV-Vis   Raman   NMR   X-Ray   Fluorescence  
Home
Magazine
Issue Archive
Subscribe/Renew
Special Issues
Reprints
The Application Notebook
Current Issue
Archive
Submission Guidelines
Training
SpecAcademy
E-solutions
Digital Edition
Subscribe to the Digital Edition
The Wavelength
Subcribe to The Wavelength
Subscribe to the MS E-news
Resources
Market Profiles
Information for Authors
SpecTube
Webcasts
Advertiser services
Contact Us
Columns
Atomic Perspectives
Chemometrics in Spectroscopy
Focus on Quality
Laser and Optics Interface
Mass Spectrometry Forum
The Baseline
Molecular Spectroscopy Workbench

Using the Full Spectrum for Raman: From UV to NIR

Raman Scattering

The "inelastic scattering of light," or Raman effect, was observed in practice for the first time in 1928 by C.V. Raman for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1930. It is only in the last two decades, however, that Raman spectroscopy has begun to realize its potential as an almost universally applicable analytical technique from materials and life sciences applications to point of care analysis. This is primarily thanks to the availability of compact laser sources, high sensitivity cameras, and high resolution compact spectrometers.

Wavelength is Key

The physical basis of the technique offers huge flexibility and advantages in comparison with its sister technique, infrared spectroscopy, but at the same time presents a key challenge: the excitation needs to be highly (i) monochromatic (the Raman bands have the same shape as the light source) (ii) collimated and (iii) intense (due to the low probability of inelastic scattering, < 1 in 106 photons). Hence, it is the advent of lasers that has brought Raman spectroscopy — literarily — into the field.


Figure 1: Near-IR dispersive Raman spectrosocpy. Comparison of the spectrum of a solid sample of an organic fluorophore at 785 nm (red) with that obtained at 1064 nm (blue). Excitation with a Cobolt Rumba™ 1064 nm (100 mW at sample), detection 4 by 5 s exposure, Andor idus163 spectrograph with an iDus-InGaAs detector.
In selecting the correct laser, the wavelength is important and depends on the application. For example, fluorescence is usually much stronger than the Raman scattering signal but unlike the fluorescence, the Raman scattering signal is observed even when exciting at wavelengths outside the absorption spectrum. Figure 1 illustrates this by showing that the fluorescence that swamps the Raman spectrum of a boron based fluorophore when the Raman spectrum is recorded at 785 nm (where absorption/fluorescence competes with the Raman process) is completely absent in the spectrum obtained at 1064 nm. Thus highlighting the importance of selecting the right excitation wavelength.

DPSS Lasers for Raman Spectroscopy

Until recently, ion gas lasers (Ar, He, HeCd, and Kr) have been the first choice for Raman spectroscopy. However, the ever increasing number of wavelengths available with continuous wave diode pumped solid state (DPSS) lasers together with the high average powers (> 1 W) and compact footprint means that multi-wavelength Raman spectroscopy can be implemented as a turnkey low maintenance solution in any laboratory as well as in field portable applications. For example, Cobolt DPSS lasers qualify as excellent Raman excitation sources, thanks to their extremely narrow linewidth (<1 MHz), excellent wavelength stability, and high level of spectral purity (-60 dB).


Rate This Article
Your original vote has been tallied and is included in the ratings results.
View our top pages
Average rating for this page is: 0
Headlines from LCGC North America and Chromatography Online
Online Sample Cleanup &mdash; A Cost-Efficient Alternative to Conventional SPE and Liquid&ndash;Liquid Extraction Methods
The Development of a Method for Arsenic Speciation and the Use of Ion Chromatography as a Solution for Separation
Add Isotope Ratio Information to Your Research
Merck KGaA to Acquire Sigma-Aldrich for Approx. $17 billion (&euro;13.1 billion)
Maintaining Precision During Method Transfer
Source: Application Notebook,
Click here