The analytical spectrometry research group at the University of Oviedo, Asturias, Spain, was founded more than 20 years ago
to develop analytical science and solve the analytical challenges encountered by science and technology. Considering that
such problems can be incredibly diverse, the analytical methods used by the group in its studies must be able to cope with
each specific problem or challenge. The group consists of over 30 members, each of whom specializes in a field of analytical
chemistry. This enables the group to establish specialized research groups for all of its projects and utilize the individual
expertise of each of its members across areas including atomic spectrometry, molecular spectrometry, and coupling of separation
with specific detectors.
To extend the group's research, Dr. Jörg Bettmer has established a small subgroup within the analytical spectrometry research
group under the supervision of Professor Alfredo Sanz-Medel. His work is focused on the development of inductively coupled
plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)-based analytical methods for the quantification of biopolymers such as DNA and proteins.
For this, the group uses two different strategies: heteroatom-tagged protein and DNA analysis, and chemical labeling strategies
by means of metal-containing compounds. Within these strategies, isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) techniques play
an important role. These techniques also are used within the group for the direct determination of trace elements in petroleum
products as well as in nanoparticle material research.
One of the principle analytical challenges faced by the research group is the interference from gas-based polyatomics such
as oxygen in the determination of sulfur when using a low-resolution instrument. To overcome these issues the group has implemented
a quadrupole inductively coupled mass spectrometer with a collision/reaction cell (CRC) design. Combined with the instrument's
use of ion–molecule reactions of S+ with O2 to form SO+, the system can overcome the group's issues and provide accurate determination of sulfur isotopes.
Quantitative Protein Analysis
Quantitative protein analysis is currently one of the most ambitious challenges in analytical chemistry. Mass spectrometric
techniques such as electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–mass
spectrometry (MALDI-MS) play a major role in protein analysis. However, the potential of ICP-MS recently has been recognized
for the determination of proteins (1,2). Although ICP-MS detection does not provide any structural information, its outstanding
potential in quantifying most of the elements give an additional and complementary value to the field of protein quantification.
Potential targets of ICP-MS detection in proteins are metals incorporated in metalloproteins and metalloenzymes, selenium
in selenium-containing proteins and selenoproteins, phosphorus occurring as posttranslational modifications in proteins and
peptides, and finally, sulfur as a natural constituent of the amino acids cysteine and methionine. Sulfur is expected to be
present in about 70% of all proteins of a biological sample. Therefore, its determination can serve as an alternative tool
for quantification of proteins with a known amino acid sequence and with a known number of sulfur-containing amino acids.
Sulfur detection by ICP-MS is hampered mainly by two facts. First, the high first ionization potential (10.36 eV) that is
responsible for the decreased ionization of this element in the ICP source, and second, the occurrence of spectral interferences
on m/z 32 and 34. The main interference on 32S+ and 34S+, the most abundant sulfur isotopes, derive from O2
+ species: 16O16O+ and 16O18O+, respectively. However, less abundant molecular ions like 31P1H+, 14N18O+, 15N16O1H+ (on 32S+), 32S1H1H+ and 16O16O1H1H+ (on 34S+), have to be considered as well for interference-free sulfur detection. Although the use of the instrumentation can easily
separate all these molecular species from the elemental ions in the medium resolution mode (m/Δm = 4000), the interferences are more challenging for ICP-MS instruments based upon a collision cell design (3,4).
The University of Oviedo's analytical spectrometry group aims to optimize its mass spectrometer for reliable sulfur detection
and its application to the determination of sulfur-containing standard proteins. The use of oxygen in the collision cell was
chosen for the removal of spectral interferences by the formation of the SO+ species. Instrumental parameters were optimized by using the ratio of the SO+ species that contain the two major isotopes of sulfur (m/z = 48 and 50). Under optimal conditions (summarized in Table I) the separation of proteins by reversed-phase capillary liquid
chromatography (LC) coupled to the mass spectrometer was demonstrated.
Table I: HPLC–ICP-MS system parameters
An XSERIES 2 ICPQ-MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) ICP-MS system was used throughout this work. Equipped with
CRC, the instrument was optimized for the interference-free detection of sulfur. This was achieved by utilizing the ion–molecule
reaction between S+ and O2 to shift the analyte to SO+ species (S+ + O2 → SO+ + O) detected at m/z 48 and 50, respectively (5). Important parameters of the CRC were optimized for the expected ratio
of m/z 48 to 50 (after mass bias correction) as well as for maximum sensitivity (6).
The instrument was coupled to a capillary LC system equipped with a reversed-phase diphenyl column for protein separation
(Table I). Reversed-phase chromatographic separations usually require the use of organic modifiers like methanol or acetonitrile.
The introduction of these organics into the ICP system causes severe problems like plasma instability and carbon deposition
on the cones. A simple solution is the reduction of the total flow rate from the milliliter-per-minute range (as in normal-bore
high performance liquid chromatography [HPLC]) to the low microliters-per-minute range (capillary LC). However, these lower
flow rates (in the range of 10 µL/min) require specially designed nebulizers and spray chambers for an efficient sample introduction.
The interface used throughout this work consisted of a µ-flow nebulizer (DS-5) adapted to a total consumption spray chamber
similar to the set-up described by Lobinski's group (7). For efficient carbon removal, oxygen was added directly into the
spray chamber (35 mL/min), which also significantly reduced any signal suppression caused by the introduction of the organic
modifier (8). This set-up provides stable conditions in terms of signal stability and sensitivity over several hours, even
if 100% acetonitrile is introduced.