This interview segment shifts away from the technology that is impacting forensic sciences and instead focuses on a broader issue in the industry.
The American Academy of Forensic Science (AAFS) Conference, which took place in Baltimore, Maryland, earlier this year, dedicated much of the conference program to discussions about the use of technology. Although technology has certainly played a major role in numerous forensic science disciplines over the past few years in spurring new advancements and changes in how investigations are conducted, the forensic discipline of latent prints has not seen these types of advancements in technology.
Instead, latent print technology has only encountered minor improvements in tools and algorithms. However, Heidi Eldridge, who is a Certified Latent Print Examiner, said to Spectroscopy that the focus in her field is on presenting clearer and more accurate communication of findings.
In this interview clip, Eldridge discusses this shift in priorities, as well as addresses initiatives at the Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC) for Forensic Science that aim to standardize language and expectations across forensic disciplines to enhance consistency and clarity for stakeholders, who often struggle to understand the basis of forensic science and its results.
Eldridge has had an extensive career in forensic science. She started her pursuit of a forensic science career at Duke University, where she received her MS in Biology (1). She then went on to obtain her Ph.D. in Forensic Science from the University of Lausanne (1). She has spent over 11 years in forensic laboratories and seven years as a researcher at RTI International (1). She chairs the Friction Ridge Consensus Body of the ASB, serves on multiple boards, and is a Certified Latent Print Examiner (1). Eldridge is a Fellow of the AAFS and a peer reviewer for several forensic journals (1).
In a couple previous interview segments, Eldridge discussed one of her talks and the current challenges that are directly impacting the forensic science industry (2,3). This interview segment shifts away from the technology that is impacting forensic sciences and instead focuses on a broader issue in the industry.
This interview segment is part of our coverage of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) Conference. To view all our coverage from AAFS, click here.
The Future of Neurodegenerative Disease Research and the Role of IR Imaging
May 21st 2025In the final part of this three-part interview, Ayanjeet Ghosh of the University of Alabama and Rohit Bhargava of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign talk about the key performance metrics they used to evaluate their model, and what the future of neurodegenerative disease research looks like.
Describing Their Two-Step Neural Model: An Interview with Ayanjeet Ghosh and Rohit Bhargava
May 20th 2025In the second part of this three-part interview, Ayanjeet Ghosh of the University of Alabama and Rohit Bhargava of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign discuss how machine learning (ML) is used in data analysis and go into more detail about the model they developed in their study.