News|Articles|August 11, 2026

Identifying the Geographic Origin of Roasted Coffee

Listen
0:00 / 0:00

Key Takeaways

  • Geographic-origin verification underpins pricing integrity and consumer trust, while chromatography and sensory panels remain impractical for routine QC due to destructiveness, latency, and subjectivity.
  • Spectral fingerprints from Ethiopia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Kenya, Mexico, Peru, and Rwanda showed separable clusters by origin and variety after MIR/NIR acquisition and artifact-correcting preprocessing.
SHOW MORE

An upcoming poster presentation set to take place at the American Chemical Society (ACS) Fall 2026 Meeting will explore how spectroscopy is being used to distinguish different roasted coffee types.

In a recent study, a team of researchers from the University of Bergen have developed a spectroscopy-based method that can identify the geographic origin of roasted coffee in minutes without destroying the sample.1 Because destructive sampling was the primary method of conducting this type of analysis in the past, the study adds to the building body of work that is exploring the use of new, nondestructive technologies that can analyze food products such as coffee.

Sleshi Fentie Tadesse will present the findings of this study during a poster session at McCormick Place Convention Center, In Chicago, Illinois, on Wednesday, August 26, from 7 to 9 p.m. EDT. Tadesse will show how the study combined two infrared (IR) spectroscopy techniques (in this case, attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) and near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy) with statistical modeling to classify roasted, ground coffee by origin, variety, and roast level.1

Why is knowing the geographical origin of food products important?

Understanding the geographical origin of coffee is important because it helps the market accurately price the coffee and determine consumer trust. Currently, existing verification methods, which include chromatography and sensory panels, are accurate but slow, require destroying the sample, and depend on subjective human judgment.1 Because of these three factors, using chromatography and sensory panels are not practical methods for routine quality control.1

What did the researchers do in their study?

The researchers used coffee samples sourced from various countries known for their coffee quality. The countries selected were Ethiopia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Kenya, Mexico, Peru, and Rwanda. Once the samples were obtained, the team scanned samples across the mid-infrared (MIR) and NIR ranges before processing the resulting spectral data to remove noise and scattering artifacts.1 Statistical modeling revealed that samples clustered distinctly by origin and variety, indicating that chemical differences between growing regions leave a measurable signature.1

Which classification approach performed better in this study?

As part of the poster presentation, Tadesse will explain that the study tested two classification approaches, soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). SIMCA correctly distinguished coffee origins with 100% specificity and better than 92% accuracy, though it performed less reliably when sorting samples by roast level.1 Meanwhile, PLS-DA achieved perfect classification across all metrics tested, with strong statistical confidence.1 The ATR-FTIR data outperformed NIR data in predictive accuracy, which is a difference the researchers attribute to ATR-FTIR's greater sensitivity to specific molecular structures.

What are the implications of this study?

The coffee industry is currently lacking a quality-control tool that can be deployed at scale. Because the method Tadesse will present is non-destructive, it could also be integrated into existing inspection workflows without disrupting supply chains.1 As a result, the combined technique can be a candidate for routine authentication and quality assurance applications going forward, pending further validation on roasting-degree discrimination.1

What should attendees know about the upcoming ACS 2026 Fall Meeting?

The ACS 2026 Fall Meeting will be taking place from August 23rd to the 27th in Chicago, Illinois. It is expected to draw over 10,000 attendees for technical sessions, professional development courses, and an exposition.2 The meeting's theme is "Chemists Making History," marking ACS's 150th anniversary under the banner #ACS150. The technical program is expected to be extensive, with approximately 5,255 in-person oral presentations and 4,206 poster presentations set to take place during the conference.2 Meanwhile, there will also be a special anniversary symposium featuring Nobel laureates Carolyn Bertozzi, Stefan Hell, Jack W. Szostak, and Stanley Whittingham.2

References
  1. Tadesse, S. F. Characterization and Classification of Roasted Ground Coffee Using ATR-FTIR and NIR Spectroscopy Combined with Multivariate Analysis. Presented at the American Chemical Society Fall 2026 Meeting, Chicago Illinois, August 26, 2026. Available at: https://acs.digitellinc.com/live/37/page/1374?search=Sleshi%20Fentie%20Tadesse&window-sxlznr
  2. Wetzel, W. Why Spectroscopists Should Attend the ACS Fall 2026 Conference. Spectroscopy Online, 2026. https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/why-spectroscopists-should-attend-the-acs-fall-2026-conference (accessed July 23, 2026).

Related to this article

2026 SciX Conference Summary ©   Bos Amico -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
SciX 2026, the annual conference presented by the Federation of Analytical Chemistry and Spectroscopy Societies (FACSS), ran October 4–9, 2026, at the Nugget Casino Resort in Sparks, Nevada. The program spanned atomic and molecular spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, chemometrics, and bioanalysis. This report follows the meeting day by day, from Monday's clinical Raman plenaries to Friday's closing talks, drawing on the online program and Spectroscopy coverage of award winners, highlighting efforts to move Raman, SERS, LIBS, and single-particle ICP-MS toward clinical, environmental, and field use.
FACSS 2026 Award Interviews ©  Erin -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
Eight FACSS award winners at SciX 2026, One LIBS trailblazer. Forty-eight questions. And not one of them is a softball. Award season in spectroscopy usually means polite applause, a plaque, and a photo. We're not completely interested only in the award sessions. The eight scientists honored at SciX 2026 in Sparks, Nevada, along with LIBS researcher Alessandro De Giacomo, are pushing Raman into operating rooms, flying LIBS on drones, reading chemistry off Mars, and tracing toxic metals downwind of industrial sites. Their work makes big claims. In the coming days, Spectroscopy will sit down with eight of these researchers and ask whether those claims hold up. The interviews that follow won't just celebrate. They'll press on the gaps between simulation and experiment, between the lab bench and the clinic, and between a clever paper and an instrument someone will actually buy and use.
Sparks near Reno Nevada – Site of 2026 SciX Conference ©   DTM Media  -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
Wednesday's program at SciX 2026 kept returning to one question: can spectroscopy perform outside the controlled laboratory? Speakers took surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), mid-infrared photonics, chemometrics, and fluorescence excitation–emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy into clinics, food plants, reactor coolant loops, brine fields, and drinking water supplies.
Nancy Pleshko (left) is a Laura H. Carnell Professor Emerita in Temple University's Department of Bioengineering. Petra A. Baylin (right) is a research assistant in the Tissue Imaging and Spectroscopy Lab at Temple University. Photo Credits: © Nancy Pleshko and Petra Baylin
As part of our coverage of the SciX 2026 Conference, Nancy Pleshko and Petra Baylin of Temple University sat down with Spectroscopy to talk about their recent study, explaining how Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) imaging of ultra-high weight molecular polyethylene (UHMWPE) implants permits oxidation evaluation throughout the sample yielding insight into failure.
NIR Spectroscopy of the Brain and Other Complex Analyses, ©   Navaporn  -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
Near-infrared spectroscopy has quietly stopped being a niche calibration exercise and started acting like an autonomous diagnostic partner, reading consciousness in an injured brain, steering a fermenter without a human hand, and hunting invisible plastic in a glass of water. The tool chemists once used to check moisture in grain is now fusing with artificial intelligence to make decisions no spectrometer could make alone.
PFAS spiking experiments in bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris)
Atomic Perspectives
This Atomic Perspectives column explains how high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry (HR-CS-GFMAS) quantifies extractable organic fluorine (EOF) as a PFAS sum parameter, complementing LC-MS/MS target analysis, with applications to German river sediments, bean plants, and fluorinated polymer sealing materials.