According to the review article, the ability of ML algorithms to learn from and interpret vast and complex data sets makes them ideal for handling SERS signals, which often exhibit high dimensionality and variability (1). Some of the ML algorithms that are most popular include principal component analysis (PCA), support vector machines (SVM), convolutional neural networks (CNN), and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE). These techniques have all been successfully and recently used to classify spectral data, identify biomarkers, and even predict disease states with high accuracy and speed (1).
There are numerous important takeaways researchers should digest from this article. First, the authors break down the computational workflows and talk in length about how SERS and ML fit into them. Unlike many earlier reviews that focused heavily on nanomaterial design or broad SERS applications, this article emphasizes the computational strategies required to analyze Raman spectral data effectively (1). Therefore, the authors offer insight on the theoretical underpinnings of ML and DL, offering practical insights into model training, evaluation, and interpretation (1).
Another main takeaway of this article is that the authors provide examples of ML-assisted SERS applications in action, offering specifics on what this integration looks like. Notable examples highlighted in this review include rapid fluid diagnostics, where ML models help interpret complex bodily fluid spectra in minutes, and intraoperative cancer margin detection, where AI-integrated SERS systems provide real-time feedback to surgeons (1). These innovations point to a future in which portable SERS devices, powered by ML algorithms, could be deployed in point-of-care settings to deliver fast and reliable diagnostics (1).
Although AI is becoming a routine part of scientific research, there are still some challenges and limitations that emerge when using AI in clinical diagnostics. The authors acknowledge in their article that there is a lack of standardized SERS data format, difficulties in reproducing results across platforms, and the need for larger annotated data sets to train robust ML models (1).
To address these issues, the authors suggest that interpretable ML models need to be developed further. As the authors emphasize in their article, the continued evolution of both SERS instrumentation and AI methodologies could lead to many positive outcomes for healthcare diagnostics (1).
References
- Tang, J.-W.; Yuan, Q.; Zhang, L.; Marshall, B. J.; et al. Application of Machine Learning-assisted Surface-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Medical Laboratories: Principles, Opportunities, and Challenges. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2025, 184, 118135. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2025.118135
- Al-Antari, M. A. Artificial Intelligence for Medical Diagnostics—Existing and Future AI Technology! Diagnostics (Basel). 2023, 13 (4), 688. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040688