Roman Coins Treasure. Pile of Empire Roman Coins | Image Credit: © wojciechkic.com - stock.adobe.com.

Studying historical ancient artifacts requires the use of a nondestructive technique to analyze the metal surfaces of these objects. This study presents two approaches that improves on existing methods when conducting alloy analysis.
In a recent study published in Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, lead author S. Porcinai from the Ministry of Culture in Firenze, Italy, sheds light on the challenges and advancements in analyzing historical metal artifacts (1). The investigation of alloy composition remains pivotal in understanding the history and craftsmanship behind these artifacts.
Roman Coins Treasure. Pile of Empire Roman Coins | Image Credit: © wojciechkic.com - stock.adobe.com.
Porcinai and the research team examined the efficacy of analyzing surface samples compared to shavings from certified reference materials. The goal was to enhance the accuracy and precision when collecting quantitative data. Previous research efforts in alloy analysis saw researchers use portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) to conduct quantitative analysis (1). However, researchers were limited in the data they could collect when metal surfaces of alloys were concealed by patination layers or corrosion (1).
Porcinai and the team demonstrated in their study that when a suitable calibration model using certified reference materials in the same form (surface or shavings) was applied, quantitative data obtained from both surfaces and shavings exhibited comparable accuracy and precision (1). Repeatability tests on detected elements using the same certified reference materials demonstrated results within a 5% margin, affirming the reliability of the approach (1).
The study focused on two approaches. First, the abration of a small portion to eliminate corrosion products, and second, collecting samples in the form of shavings or micro-fragments (1).
The significance of quantitative elemental analysis in understanding ancient bronze artifacts cannot be overstated. It unravels insights into the technical prowess of craftsmen, manufacturing techniques, and even the sourcing and trade of raw materials (1). Although pXRF analysis is a widely used non-invasive technique for studying ancient copper alloys, the presence of surface irregularities has posed a challenge to precise quantification of bulk properties (1).
Historical metal artifacts are a key ingredient to learning about the past in a nuanced way. By refining non-invasive analysis techniques, researchers aimed to decode the intricate stories embedded in these invaluable relics while preserving their integrity for generations to come (1).
This article was written with the help of artificial intelligence and has been edited to ensure accuracy and clarity. You can read more about our policy for using AI here.
(1) Porcinai, S.; Cagnini, A.; Galeotti, M.; Ferretti, M. Quantitative Analysis of Copper Alloys by Means of Portable X-ray Fluorescence: A Comparison Between Analysis of Shavings and Surfaces. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: At. Spectrosc. 2023, 210, 106808. DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2023.106808
Get essential updates on the latest spectroscopy technologies, regulatory standards, and best practices—subscribe today to Spectroscopy.
New Study Expands Nickel Autoionization Spectra to Advance Laser Isotope Separation Technologies
July 17th 2025Researchers at China’s National Key Laboratory have identified 170 nickel autoionization states using resonance ionization mass spectrometry, significantly advancing the spectral database critical for laser isotope separation and atomic spectroscopy.
AI-Powered Fusion Model Improves Detection of Microplastics in the Atmosphere
July 17th 2025Researchers from Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology have introduced a breakthrough AI-enhanced multimodal strategy for real-time detection of polyamide microplastics contaminated with heavy metals.
How Analytical Chemists Are Navigating DOGE-Driven Funding Cuts
July 14th 2025DOGE-related federal funding cuts have sharply reduced salaries, lab budgets, and graduate support in academia. Researchers view the politically driven shifts in priorities as part of recurring systemic issues in U.S. science funding during administrative transitions. The impact on Federal laboratories has varied, with some seeing immediate effects and others experiencing more gradual effects. In general, there is rising uncertainty over future appropriations. Sustainable recovery may require structural reforms, leaner administration, and stronger industry-academia collaboration. New commentary underscores similar challenges, noting scaled-back graduate admissions, spending freezes, and a pervasive sense of overwhelming stress among faculty, students, and staff. This article addresses these issues for the analytical chemistry community.