Vibrational Spectroscopy of Individual Aerosol Droplets by Optical Tweezers

April 1, 2019
Bryan R. Bzdek, Jim S. Walker

Volume 34, Issue 4

Page Number: 22–31

Raman spectroscopy, using optical tweezers, is capable of measuring the size, refractive index, and chemical composition of single aerosol droplets, at picoliter volumes. This information improves our understanding of molecular-level chemical processes within droplets.

Aerosols are key components in a wide range of environmental systems and industrial contexts, spanning air pollution and clouds, to engineered nanomaterials, to drug delivery to the lungs. However, the basic properties of aerosols are often elusive, due to their small sizes and capacity to rapidly respond to changing ambient conditions. In this article, we discuss Raman spectroscopy of individual picoliter volume droplets using optical tweezers. Single droplet spectroscopy enables highly accurate and precise measurements of droplet size and refractive index, as well as measurement of droplet chemical composition. Time-resolved measurements permit investigation of fundamental droplet properties, including hygroscopic response, vapor pressure, and surface and bulk characteristics. Such information improves our molecular level understanding of chemical processes within single droplets, and facilitates broader understanding of complex systems.

Aerosols, which are solid particles or liquid droplets suspended in air, are ubiquitous. Aerosols negatively affect human health through air pollution (1), but also improve health by serving as delivery agents for pharmaceuticals (2). With respect to the atmosphere, aerosols are generally thought to cool climate by scattering solar radiation and by serving as the seeds for cloud droplets (3). Aerosols also have a wide range of industrial applications, including spray drying, inkjet printing, personal care products, combustion, and agricultural chemicals. To resolve aerosol impacts on health and climate, or to engineer effective industrial products, knowledge of parameters like particle size, composition, interaction with light, and surface and bulk properties is required. Moreover, it is beneficial to resolve these properties on a single particle basis, as even a nominally homogeneous and monodisperse particle ensemble has inherent distributions in key properties like particle size.

Aerosols are intrinsically interesting, because they exhibit unique properties relative to bulk systems (4). Figure 1 highlights some of these properties, with a hygroscopic growth curve for a sodium chloride (NaCl) particle, plotting a change in droplet mass (relative to a dry particle) against ambient relative humidity (RH). At low RH, a NaCl aerosol contains no water, and is therefore a solid particle. With increasing RH, water adsorbs to the solid particle surface until reaching the deliquescence RH (~75% for NaCl), which is the RH at which the solid particle absorbs enough water to undergo spontaneously a phase transition to a liquid droplet, and is equivalent to the water activity at the solubility limit of a bulk solution of NaCl. Beyond this point, the liquid droplet size increases with increasing RH. Starting from a liquid droplet at high RH, lowering RH decreases droplet size due to water evaporation. However, rather than undergo a phase change at the deliquescence RH, the droplet will continue to shrink until reaching the efflorescence RH (~43% RH for NaCl), which is the RH where the liquid droplet spontaneously undergoes a phase change to form a solid particle, and highlights a hysteresis in phase that depends on the direction of the RH change. This observation is remarkable; liquid droplets between the deliquescence and efflorescence RH can exist in metastable, supersaturated solute states. In the case of NaCl, the aqueous concentration at the deliquescence RH (that is, the bulk solubility limit) is 6.2 molal, whereas, at the efflorescence RH, it is 13.2 molal. For a soluble organic, the solute concentration can range from ~5 molal at the deliquescence RH to >30 molal at dry conditions. Such compositions can exhibit highly non-ideal behavior, and may inhibit nucleation of a solid particle, instead forming an amorphous glass. The high surface-to-volume ratio of aerosols also means that particles can respond rapidly (<1 ms) to changes in the gas phase, potentially resulting in different product distributions after a reaction due to size-dependent competition among gas-diffusion, surface accommodation, and particle bulk transport.

Figure 1: Illustration of a hygroscopic growth curve for a sodium chloride (NaCl) particle. Note the hysteresis in particle phase between 43% and 75% relative humidity (RH), where, depending on the RH pathway, NaCl is either a solid particle or a liquid droplet.

To measure individual droplet properties by spectroscopic approaches, the droplet location must first be controllable. Optical tweezers are one method to capture and manipulate 3–10 µm radius droplets over long time periods. The approach, recently recognized by the 2018 Nobel Prize awarded to Arthur Ashkin, employs a tightly focussed laser beam to create a gradient force optical trap that immobilizes a particle by exploiting the refractive index (RI) difference between the particle and surrounding medium. Optical tweezers are perhaps better known for applications to condensed systems, but in fact some of the early optical trapping work captured liquid droplets in air (5,6). Figure 2 illustrates a typical aerosol optical tweezers (AOT) setup, similar to that sold commercially by Biral, configured to allow production of multiple, steerable optical traps for the study of droplet coalescence (7,8). A spatial light modulator dynamically shapes the phase front of a continuous wave 532 nm laser to form multiple, steerable optical traps. When the trap separation is sufficiently small, droplet coalescence is induced. Brightfield imaging is accomplished by a blue LED. Backscattered Raman light is imaged onto the entrance slit of a spectrograph to perform single droplet spectroscopy. Elastic backscattered light, the intensity of which varies during droplet coalescence, is directed to a photodiode, and recorded with an oscilloscope. Droplets are typically nebulized from solution, and captured in an isolated RH-controlled trapping chamber. This approach enables measurement of a range of physical and chemical properties of an optically trapped droplet.

Figure 2: Schematic of a holographic aerosol optical tweezers (AOT) setup capable of collecting Raman spectra on individual droplets as well as elastic backscattered light to study droplet coalescence (7,8).

In this article, we describe the utility of the AOT approach to characterize spectroscopically individual picoliter-volume droplets. We first discuss the principles of cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and then highlight the precise and time-resolved measurements of chemical and physical properties enabled by these measurements.


Raman Spectroscopy of Individual Droplets

Cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy is the primary tool for analyzing optically tweezed droplets, because it allows high precision measurements of size and RI, as well as information about droplet chemical composition. The AOT setup permits efficient acquisition of Raman scattered light because the trapping laser beam and microscope objective are also used as a Raman excitation source and high efficiency collection optic, respectively, allowing a time resolution <1 s.

Figure 3(a) shows a Raman spectrum from an optically tweezed aqueous sucrose droplet. The Raman signal consists of two components: the spontaneous signal and the stimulated signal (9–14). The spontaneous signal is the broad, underlying Stokes band that provides information about the droplet's chemical composition. The stimulated signal presents as the superimposed structure, and arises because the spherical droplet behaves as a low loss optical cavity at wavelengths commensurate with whispering gallery modes (WGMs). When spontaneous Raman emission overlaps with a WGM, a standing wave forms around the circumference of the droplet, and stimulates further emission at the same frequency, resulting in sharp peaks at discrete wavelengths. Each stimulated peak is described by a mode order n (defined by the number of standing waves around the droplet circumference) and mode number l (defined by the number of radial maxima in the distribution of the mode intensity). For each mode number and mode order, there exists a transverse electric (TE) mode (having no radial electric field component) and a transverse magnetic (TM) mode (having no radial magnetic field).

Figure 3: (a) A cavity-enhanced Raman spectrum of an optically tweezed aqueous sucrose droplet. The spontaneous Raman signal centred around 650 nm is the O-H stretching vibration of water, whereas the signal around 630 nm is the C-H stretching vibration. The stimulated Raman signal is the superimposed structure on the spontaneous band; (b) whispering gallery mode (WGM) position is closely related to droplet size.

WGM wavelengths are highly sensitive to droplet size and composition. Figure 3(b) illustrates the magnitude of the shifts in WGM wavelengths as an aqueous sucrose droplet changes radius in response to a change in ambient RH. WGM wavelengths can be calculated using Mie theory (15), if the size and RI are known. The wavelengths at which stimulated Raman signals are observed experimentally and compared to a library of Mie theory simulations calculated for various size and RI combinations, with the best match giving the correct size and RI. The comparison can be performed in <1 s using custom-built software, allowing the physical properties of the droplet to be tracked in real time, with accuracy of ±2 nm in radius and 0.0005 in RI (16). The next sections illustrate how such accurate and precise measurements permit elucidation of a wide range of fundamental droplet properties.

Hygroscopicity and Vapor Pressure

Figure 4 shows a change in the properties of a glycerol droplet as RH is systematically decreased. These data were collected using the commercially available instrument from Biral. Small changes in WGM wavelengths can be related to precise changes in droplet radius as in Figure 4(a), and RI as in Figure 4(b). As RH is stepped from 80% to 30% in 10% intervals, the droplet responds by losing water, resulting in a step change in droplet size. This loss of water also increases the glycerol concentration, leading to a corresponding increase in droplet RI, as the RI of glycerol is larger than that of water. Note the high precision in the measurement, indicating very little second-to-second variation in droplet parameters. The observed changes in droplet size and RI describe the hygroscopic response of the droplet. Hygroscopicity impacts the number and size distribution of atmospheric cloud droplets, as well as the optical properties of atmospheric aerosol. Because particle deposition in the respiratory tract is size-dependent, hygroscopicity also influences deposition and ultimately health effects.

Figure 4: Response of a glycerol droplet to changes in ambient relative humidity (RH). Changes in whispering gallery mode (WGM) position are used to quantify changes in (a) droplet radius, and (b) refractive index (RI). The red dotted lines indicate the loss of semivolatile glycerol during periods of constant RH.

Figure 5 shows how hygroscopic response can be used to identify changes in particle composition (17). Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show droplet radius and RI (retrieved from the stimulated Raman signal), whereas Figure 5(c) shows the ratio of the intensities of the C-H to O-H stretching regions in the spontaneous Raman signal (IvC-H/IvO-H). Initially, a NaCl droplet is captured and equilibrated to a constant gas flow at 80% RH. During 1000–1400 s, a flow of aqueous NaCl aerosol is introduced into the trapping chamber without altering the ambient RH. The introduced aqueous droplets coalesce with the trapped droplet, increasing the trapped droplet's radius, but maintaining the same RI, as the droplet chemical composition remains unchanged. Then, during 3000–3400 s, a flow of aqueous sucrose aerosol is introduced into the trapping chamber, again maintaining an RH around 80%. In this case, droplet size changes due to the accretion of sucrose aerosol. The accretion of sucrose also increases the droplet RI, and the resulting change in droplet composition is reflected in the observed increase in the IvC-H/IvO-H ratio.

Figure 5: Droplet (a) radius, (b) refractive index (RI), and (c) chemical composition for a coalescence sampling measurement. In the first coalescence window (first purple box), a flow of aqueous sodium chloride (NaCl) droplets was introduced. In the second coalescence window, a flow of aqueous sucrose droplets was introduced; (d) Comparison of the RI-growth factor (GFd) relationship for NaCl droplets (black, red, and blue) and a NaCl droplet after a period of coalescence sampling of sucrose aerosol (green) (17).

The changes in radius and RI can be visualized in a plot of radial growth factor (GFd) against droplet RI or RH. Any droplet will have a well-defined relationship between real RI and RH, owing to the relationship between RI and solute concentration, provided the droplet chemical composition does not change beyond water uptake or loss in response to changes in ambient RH. This relationship leads to a defined trajectory between droplet RI and droplet wet radius (rwet). However, dry particle radius, rdry, will vary from measurement to measurement. A plot of radial growth factor [GFd(RH)] accounts for variations in particle dry size by defining the change in rwet relative to rdry:

Figure 5(d) shows a plot of GFd against RI for three NaCl droplets (black, blue, and red symbols) studied across a wide range in RH (96% to 49% RH, corresponding to refractive indices of 1.345 to 1.410, respectively). All these data collapse onto each other (visually represented by the line), illustrating the reproducibility in hygroscopic growth afforded by the AOT approach across multiple measurements. The green symbols show the hygroscopic growth of the NaCl droplet doped with sucrose aerosol (t > ~3400 s in Figures 5(a)–5(c)). The offset is due to the change in the relationship between droplet composition and equilibrium size, as RH is varied and highlights how compositional changes that result in only a few percent change in droplet radius can be resolved due to the high accuracy of droplet size and RI obtained from the Raman signal.


Although droplet size may change substantially, due to changes in the RH around the droplet, size may also change due to evaporation of semivolatile molecules from the droplet (18). This evaporation is evident in Figure 4, as in between the step changes in droplet size due to RH steps, the glycerol droplet size decreases linearly and its RI increases linearly (dotted lines) owing to its vapor pressure (p0G≈ 10-2 Pa). A molecule's vapor pressure is fundamentally important, because it determines partitioning between the gas and condensed phases. The slower change in droplet size and RI is due to the evaporation of glycerol (as well as commensurate water to maintain the droplet water activity equivalent to the RH). In the experiment, a humidified N2 flow is used, resulting in a concentration gradient from the droplet surface to the gas phase, leading to slow volatilization of glycerol at a rate governed by its vapor pressure at the solution composition, pG, which in turn depends on the glycerol mole fraction, xG, and the activity coefficient, γG:

Measurement of the rate of change in droplet size (dr2/dt) is related to p0 for a given molecule through the Maxwell equation:

where Mi is the molecular mass of semivolatile compound i, Di is its diffusion constant in the surrounding gas, R is the ideal gas constant, T is temperature, ρ is the droplet density, Fi is the mass fraction of compound i, pi,r is the vapor pressure in equilibrium at the droplet surface, and pi,∞ is partial pressure of the molecule at infinite distance from the droplet surface (assumed zero).

Aerosol Surfaces and Bulk Properties

We next discuss droplet surface and bulk properties, which are key to a range of processes. For example, surface tension helps determine what fraction of atmospheric particles grow into cloud droplets by governing the critical supersaturation in RH that must be surpassed (19). Moreover, the surface composition of droplets can affect the transport of molecules like water into and out of the droplet (20), as well as promote very different reactions from those occurring in the droplet bulk (21). Knowledge of bulk properties allows a better understanding of transport processes within the droplet, which can help explain droplet heterogeneity, reactivity, and composition (22). For example, a highly viscous droplet can inhibit diffusion of reactant molecules, resulting in slower apparent reaction rates (23). Understanding the interplay between surface and bulk properties enables control over droplet structure, which is important in many industrial contexts (24).

Figure 6: (a) High frame rate images after coalescence of two aqueous, surfactant-doped sodium chloride (NaCl) droplets. (b) Elastic backscattered light intensity collected after coalescence (left axis) and droplet aspect ratios from the images in part (a) (right axis); (c) A fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the signal in part (b) gives the frequency of the shape oscillations (8). In (d) measurements of picoliter droplet surface tension for NaCl, glutaric acid, and a 1:1 mass mixture of the two compounds (symbols) are compared to a statistical thermodynamic model of surface tension (lines) (27).

Surface and bulk droplet properties can be investigated by coalescence of two droplets. Droplets are captured in individual traps, equilibrated to a desired ambient condition, and then brought into coalescence at a user-defined time. For low viscosity droplets, coalescence proceeds through damped oscillations in droplet shape. Figure 6(a) shows high frame rate images of a dilute NaCl droplet coated with surfactant immediately after coalescence (8). Although high frame rate imaging visualizes the coalescence dynamics, it is more efficient to resolve the coalescence by collection of elastic backscattered light (see Figure 2). Figure 6(b) shows the elastic backscattered light from the coalescence event in Figure 6(a), along with the aspect ratios from the high frame rate images. Surface tension is determined by the equation (25,26):

where σ is surface tension, ωl is the oscillation frequency for mode l (corresponding to a characteristic deformation in droplet shape), a is the droplet radius, and a is the droplet density. Note that accurate measurement of surface tension depends on a precise measurement of droplet radius (a3 term), highlighting the benefits afforded by size characterisation using the stimulated Raman spectrum. The fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the elastic backscattered light signal allows retrieval of ωl in Figure 6(c). It is then straightforward to calculate the droplet surface tension. Figure 6(d) shows surface tensions retrieved using a holographic AOT setup for droplets containing NaCl, glutaric acid, and a 1:1 mass mixture of both solutes. These measurements compare favorably to a statistical thermodynamic model (27). Moreover, a key benefit of performing the surface tension measurement on droplets is the ability to access supersaturated solute states that are inaccessible to bulk approaches. The measured values to the right of the vertical lines in Figure 6(d) are in the supersaturated solute regime and demonstrate the benefit of aerosol measurements to test models in previously untestable regimes. In addition, measurements have highlighted that trace contaminants in air rapidly lower the surface tension of droplets to values consistent with those of surfactant solutions (8).

If the droplet viscosity is above a critical value, the surface oscillations are instantaneously damped, and coalescence proceeds through a slow merging of two droplets (7,28). This concept is demonstrated in Figure 7(a) with images of coalescing sucrose droplets that have been equilibrated to different RH values (29). Figure 7(b) shows that aspect ratios of the slowly coalescing droplets follow an exponential decay, and that depending on the droplet viscosity (governed by RH), the relaxation timescale (τl) can span from microseconds to days. The relaxation timescale is related to droplet viscosity by the equation:

where η is the droplet viscosity.


Figure 7(c) shows viscosity measurements of citric acid by both bulk and AOT approaches, comparing to 1,4-butanetriol and sucrose over the entire range of RH. This figure highlights the utility of the AOT approach to measuring viscosity. First, measurements can be made over a wide range of viscosities, from values similar to that of pure water (1 mPa·s) to values beyond the glass transition (1010 Pa·s), spanning >13 orders of magnitude. Moreover, because it is straightforward to produce droplets containing highly viscous, supersaturated solute states, this approach can measure material properties under conditions inaccessible in bulk systems. For example, bulk solutions of citric acid can only reach concentrations corresponding to water activities ~0.8 (80% RH), the bulk solubility limit. However, in the aerosol phase, the solubility limit is easily exceeded, and measurements of viscous citric acid droplets are possible across the entire range of water activity, with viscosity values extending more than six orders of magnitude larger than those accessible in bulk solution, permitting comparison to model predictions and allowing estimation of the viscosity of atmospheric particles (28).

Figure 7: (a) High frame rate images of coalescing sucrose droplets equilibrated to different relative humidity (RH) values (29); (b) Droplet aspect ratios during coalescence for several droplets, each with different viscosities (28); (c) Plot of viscosity against RH for 1,4-butanetriol, citric acid, and sucrose.

Putting It All Together

The previous sections highlight fundamental measurements possible due to single droplet Raman spectroscopy. We now present an example where spectroscopy was used to evaluate how changes in viscosity impact the droplet's reactivity with ozone, a common atmospheric oxidant (30). In the experiment, a droplet containing the semivolatile compound maleic acid (vapor pressure ~10-3 Pa), nonvolatile sucrose, and water was equilibrated to different RH values. As discussed earlier, when a droplet containing a semivolatile compound is held at constant RH, its size will slowly decrease, due to evaporation of the semivolatile compound and an appropriate amount of solvating water. From the size change (inferred from the changes to stimulated Raman band positions), the compound's pure component vapor pressure is inferred from Equation 3. Figure 8(a) illustrates the time-dependent fractional change in size for a droplet containing 5:1 maleic acid:sucrose held at different RH values. At higher RH (such as 70%) a steeper gradient in the radius change is observed as opposed to when the droplet is held at a much lower RH (such as 10%). However, based purely on vapor pressure considerations, the mass flux of maleic acid is expected to increase with decreasing RH, as the maleic acid mole fraction is increased at low RH. In fact, when the effective vapor pressure is calculated using Equation 3, the retrieved values span from <10-5 Pa at 10% to 10-3 Pa (the true value) at 70% RH. The reason for this observation is kinetic suppression of the evaporation rate. The nonvolatile sucrose component increases droplet viscosity, consequently inhibiting diffusion of maleic acid within the particle. The decreased diffusion constant makes it harder for maleic acid to reach the droplet surface and evaporate.

Figure 8(b) shows relative changes in the intensity of the vinylic C-H stretch in the spontaneous Raman spectrum when maleic acid–sucrose droplets held at different RH values are exposed to the oxidant ozone. Ozone reacts with maleic acid (which contains a carbon-carbon double bond) but not with sucrose (which lacks a C=C bond). Ozonolysis fragments maleic acid at the double bond, forming lower molecular weight molecules with a range of vapor pressures. Monitoring the vinylic C-H stretch provides a direct measure of the reaction rate of maleic acid through cleavage of the carbon-carbon double bond. There is a clear RH dependence for reactivity as seen in Figure 8(b), with droplets at higher RH exhibiting faster reaction kinetics. For comparison, the purple triangles show the change in IvC-H for a maleic acid droplet held at 73% RH in the absence of ozone (that is, the change in signal intensity entirely due to evaporation of semivolatile maleic acid). The golden triangles show reaction of a 10:1 sucrose:maleic acid mixture at 40% RH, demonstrating that ozonolysis is effectively shut down. From the spontaneous Raman data, reaction probabilities for ozone uptake can be estimated. For the 5:1 sucrose:maleic acid droplet at 75% RH, the reaction probability is similar to that retrieved from an experiment in the bulk (~8×10-6). However, for the 10:1 sucrose:maleic acid droplet at 40% RH, the reaction probability decreases by more than two orders of magnitude to <3×10-8. The explanation for the lowering of the uptake coefficient is the change in diffusivity for water and ozone that results from the matrix formed by interactions of sucrose and maleic acid.

Figure 8: (a) Fractional change in droplet size over 1400 s for a maleic acid–sucrose droplet at four different relative humidity (RH) values, showing the gradual retardation in maleic acid evaporation as RH decreases. The green envelope shows the range of the data for the mixture at 10% RH (data not shown for clarity). (b) Time-dependence of the normalized spontaneous Raman signal intensity of the maleic acid vinylic C-H stretch during oxidation experiments at different RH values for a 5:1 mass ratio sucrose–maleic acid droplet. Purple triangles show change in signal intensity for an aqueous droplet evaporating at 73% RH without reaction. Gold triangles show the change in Raman intensity during reaction of a 10:1 mass ratio droplet at 40% RH (30).

This example demonstrates how precise measurement of changes to droplet size can provide information about the phase state of a droplet, permitting insight on diffusion within the droplet. Coupling those observations with spontaneous Raman spectra allows rationalization of the reactivity of droplets as a function of their viscosity.



Aerosols are complex, highly nonideal systems that exhibit properties that often cannot easily be represented by bulk studies. Optical tweezers are a versatile approach to study problems in aerosol science on a single droplet level, with a wide range of potential applications spanning atmospheric science to materials science and pharmaceuticals. We showed that single droplet Raman spectroscopy provides a spontaneous Raman signal that gives information on chemical composition and a stimulated Raman signal when the spherical droplet behaves as a low loss optical cavity at wavelengths commensurate with WGMs. Because WGM wavelengths are highly sensitive to droplet size and composition, comparison of experimental resonances to those predicted by Mie theory permits accurate and precise retrieval of the droplet's size and RI (to ±2 nm and 0.0005, respectively). Consequently, dynamic changes to droplet physical, chemical, and optical properties can be monitored with high time resolution. These changes to droplet parameters enable determination of fundamental droplet properties including hygroscopic response, vapor pressure, surface tension, and bulk viscosity. Such information allows insight into molecular processes occurring within picoliter volumes, including how parameters like viscosity can affect the volatilization and reactivity of semivolatile compounds in the droplet. Because aerosol science is fundamental to many research areas, the AOT approach has broad utility.


B.R.B. acknowledges support from the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) through grant NE/P018459/1. No new data were created in this study.


(1) J. Lelieveld, J.S. Evans, M. Fnais, D. Giannadaki, and A. Pozzer, Nature525, 367–371 (2015).

(2) B. Forbes, B. Asgharian, L.A. Dailey, D. Ferguson, P. Gerde, M. Gumbleton, L. Gustavsson, C. Hardy, D. Hassall, R. Jones, R. Lock, J. Maas, T. McGovern, G.R. Pitcairn, G. Somers, and R.K. Wolff, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.63, 69–87 (2011).

(3) T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, P.M. Midgley, Eds. IPCC, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2013).

(4) B.R. Bzdek and J.P. Reid, J. Chem. Phys. 147, 220901 (2017).

(5) A. Ashkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 156–159 (1970).

(6) A. Ashkin and J.M. Dziedzic, Science 187, 1073–1075 (1975).

(7) R.M. Power, S.H. Simpson, J.P. Reid, and A.J. Hudson, Chem. Sci. 4, 2597–2604 (2013).

(8) B.R. Bzdek, R.M. Power, S.H. Simpson, J.P. Reid, and C.P. Royall, Chem. Sci. 7, 274–285 (2016).

(9) R. Symes, R.M. Sayer, and J.P. Reid, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6, 474–487 (2004).

(10) A. Ashkin and J.M. Dziedzic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1351–1354 (1977).

(11) S.-X. Qian and R.K. Chang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 926–929 (1986).

(12) R. Thurn and W. Kiefer, Appl. Opt. 24, 1515 (1985).

(13) K.J. Vahala, Nature 424, 839–846 (2003).

(14) A.J. Trevitt, P.J. Wearne, E.J. Bieske, and M.D. Schuder, Opt. Lett. 31, 2211 (2006).

(15) G. Mie, Ann. Phys. 25, 377–445 (1908).

(16) T.C. Preston and J.P. Reid, Opt. Soc. Am. B 30, 2113–2122 (2013).

(17) A.E. Haddrell, R.E.H. Miles, B.R. Bzdek, J.P. Reid, R.J. Hopkins, and J.S. Walker, Anal. Chem. 89, 2345–2352 (2017).

(18) F.D. Pope, H.J. Tong, B.J. Dennis-Smither, P.T. Griffiths, S.L. Clegg, J.P. Reid, and R.A. Cox, J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 10156–10165 (2010).

(19) J. Ovadnevaite, A. Zuend, A. Laaksonen, K.J. Sanchez, G. Roberts, D. Ceburnis, S. Decesari, M. Rinaldi, N. Hodas, M.C. Facchini, J.H. Seinfeld, and C. O'Dowd, Nature 546, 637–641 (2017).

(20) J.F. Davies, R.E.H. Miles, A.E. Haddrell, and J.P. Reid, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 8807–8812 (2013).

(21) E.M. Knipping, M.J. Lakin, K.L. Foster, P. Jungwirth, D.J. Tobias, R.B. Gerber, D. Dabdub, and B.J. Finlayson-Pitts, Science 288, 301–306 (2000).

(22) J.P. Reid, A.K. Bertram, D.O. Topping, A. Laskin, S.T. Martin, M.D. Petters, F.D. Pope, and G. Rovelli, Nat. Commun. 9, 956 (2018).

(23) M. Kuwata and S.T. Martin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 17354–17359 (2012).

(24) A. Baldelli and R. Vehring, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 50, 1130–1142 (2016).

(25) L. Rayleigh, Proc. R. Soc. London 29, 71–97 (1879).

(26) S. Chandrasekhar, Proc. London Math. Soc. s3-9, 141–149 (1959).

(27) H.C. Boyer, B.R. Bzdek, J.P. Reid, and C.S. Dutcher, J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 198–205 (2017).

(28) Y.C. Song, A.E. Haddrell, B.R. Bzdek, J.P. Reid, T. Bannan, D.O. Topping, C. Percival, and C. Cai, J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 8123–8137 (2016).

(29) B.R. Bzdek, L. Collard, J.E. Sprittles, A.J. Hudson, and J.P. Reid, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 054502 (2016).

(30) F.H. Marshall, R.E.H. Miles, Y.C. Song, P.B. Ohm, R.M. Power, J.P. Reid, and C.S. Dutcher, Chem. Sci. 7, 1298–1308 (2016).

Bryan R. Bzdek is an NERC Independent Research Fellow in the School of Chemistry at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Jim S. Walker is the Aerosol Products Division Manager at Biral in Bristol, United Kingdom. Direct correspondence to: