Professor Mary J. Wirth, W. Brooks Fortune Distinguished Professor Emerita at Purdue University, has been named the winner of the 2023 EAS Award for Outstanding Achievements in Separation Science. This award is presented in recognition of significant individual contributions in the advancement of separation science by superior work in developing theory, techniques, or instrumentation. The award is to be presented at a special symposium, arranged in honor of the awardee, at the 2023 Eastern Analytical Symposium on Monday, November 13, at 9 am.
Professor Wirth received her bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Northern Illinois University, where she became fascinated by separation science while taking a graduate course from Joseph Pesek. She received her Ph.D. from Purdue University, working under the direction of Fred Lytle, where she learned to invent new instrumentation to investigate chemical phenomena. Wirth’s research interests have focused on understanding silica interfaces to advance chromatography, electrophoresis, and optical spectroscopy, for which she employed tools such as optical microscopy, atomic force microscope (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR), and single-molecule spectroscopy.
Her research has been recognized with awards that include the Spectrochemical Analysis Award from the ACS Analytical Division, the Gold Medal Award from the Society for Applied Spectroscopy, the Dal Nogare Award from the Chromatography Forum of the Delaware Valley, the Jubilee Award from the Chromatography Society (Europe), and the EAS Award for Outstanding Achievements in the Fields of Analytical Chemistry.
The program for the award ceremony is as follows:
Get essential updates on the latest spectroscopy technologies, regulatory standards, and best practices—subscribe today to Spectroscopy.
How Analytical Chemists Are Navigating DOGE-Driven Funding Cuts
July 14th 2025DOGE-related federal funding cuts have sharply reduced salaries, lab budgets, and graduate support in academia. Researchers view the politically driven shifts in priorities as part of recurring systemic issues in U.S. science funding during administrative transitions. The impact on Federal laboratories has varied, with some seeing immediate effects and others experiencing more gradual effects. In general, there is rising uncertainty over future appropriations. Sustainable recovery may require structural reforms, leaner administration, and stronger industry-academia collaboration. New commentary underscores similar challenges, noting scaled-back graduate admissions, spending freezes, and a pervasive sense of overwhelming stress among faculty, students, and staff. This article addresses these issues for the analytical chemistry community.