News|Articles|November 13, 2025

Uncovering Hidden Adulterants in Wheat Flour

Author(s)Will Wetzel
Fact checked by: John Chasse
Listen
0:00 / 0:00

Key Takeaways

  • A novel method using NIR spectroscopy and deep learning detects illegal additives in wheat flour, offering rapid, non-destructive, and accurate results.
  • The LSTM-PLS model achieved high predictive accuracy, outperforming other wavelength selection methods, with R²P values of 0.9828, 0.9771, and 0.9765 for ADA, TPD, and GPD.
SHOW MORE

A new study from Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University pioneers rapid, non-destructive detection of illicit food additives using deep learning and near-infrared spectroscopy.

Wheat flour is a popular food item that is produced and shipped worldwide. As a result, it is susceptible to food fraud, meaning that illegal additives are added to it before being marketed to consumers. Because of this trend, it is important that there are methods in place to ensure wheat flour remains of high quality.

A recent study published in the journal Applied Food Research explores this topic (1). In their study, the research team from Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University (Daqing, China) has proposed a different method for detecting multiple illegal additives in wheat flour. By combining near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy with deep learning and chemometric analysis, the researchers have developed a rapid, non-destructive, and highly accurate model to identify the presence of azodicarbonamide (ADA), talcum powder (TPD), and gypsum powder (GPD) (1).

Why is wheat flour important?

Wheat is a cereal grain that is found in numerous food products worldwide. When grounded into flour, it is used to produce food items such as pasta and cereal. There are several classifications of wheat flour, including red wheat, white wheat, spring wheat, and winter wheat (2). The two main varieties are “soft” wheat, which has a low gluten content, and “hard” wheat, which has a high gluten content (2).

What did the researchers do in their study?

The researchers sought to improve on existing methods for detecting adulteration in wheat flour. Substances like ADA, which are used industrially as a blowing agent in plastics, and powders like talcum and gypsum can introduce harmful contaminants into the food chain. Traditional laboratory analyses, while precise, are often slow, expensive, and unsuitable for large-scale routine screening (1).

In their study, the researchers built a detection model that was designed to have the ability to identify all three additives in one test run. The model integrates long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks, which are a type of deep learning algorithm known for handling sequential data, with partial least squares (PLS) regression, which is a powerful statistical tool for quantitative analysis (1). To further improve the performance of their model, the Bayesian optimization algorithm was employed to fine-tune the LSTM parameters, allowing the system to automatically identify optimal spectral features (1).

What results did the LSTM-PLS model achieve?

The researchers compared the LSTM-PLS model to other wavelength selection approaches, including competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) and genetic algorithm (GA) methods. The researchers found when they tested their model that it could achieve coefficients of determination (R²P) of 0.9828, 0.9771, and 0.9765 for ADA, TPD, and GPD, respectively, along with root mean square errors of prediction (RMSEP) of just 0.0008%, 0.2915%, and 0.2822% (1).

The model also showcased stability and high predictive accuracy, with the residual prediction deviation (RPD) values reaching 7.4067, 6.4020, and 6.2159 (1).

How did the researchers validate their model?

Using wheat flour from a farm in Daqing City, the researchers created 480 samples, including both single and mixed adulterated sets, with concentrations ranging from trace levels of 0.002% ADA to 20% TPD and GPD (1). Each sample was homogenized using a turbo oscillator to ensure even distribution of the additives, which is a critical step for accurate spectroscopic measurement.

By coupling near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy with deep learning-based feature extraction, the research team has demonstrated that advanced data-driven approaches can transform food quality testing. Unlike conventional techniques that rely on chemical reagents or time-intensive chromatography, NIR spectroscopy offers a non-destructive, rapid, and environmentally friendly alternative (1). The addition of LSTM networks allows the model to handle the complex, overlapping spectral signatures that characterize adulterated samples, producing a level of accuracy suitable for industrial applications (1).

What are the key takeaways from this study?

There are a couple of key takeaways from this study. First, the framework presented here has the potential to be used to detect adulteration in other food products. Second, through the use of artificial intelligence (AI), interpreting spectroscopic data could be automated, which allows for handheld sensors to screen for adulteration (1).

By demonstrating that LSTM-PLS modeling can accurately detect multiple contaminants in complex matrices, Liu and colleagues have provided the food industry with a powerful new tool to ensure product integrity and protect public health.

“Combining NIRS with LSTM offers a fast, reliable method for detecting adulterants in mixed wheat flour, advancing rapid quality evaluation of agricultural products,” the authors concluded in their study (1).

References

  1. Dong, X.; Dong, Y.; Liu, J.; et al. Combined Use of Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics for the Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Illicit Additions in Wheat Flour. Appl. Food Res. 2025, 5 (2), 101263. DOI: 10.1016/j.afres.2025.101263
  2. Royal Lee Organics, Overview of Wheat Flour. Royal Lee Organics. Available at: https://www.organicsbylee.com/overview-of-wheat-flour/?srsltid=AfmBOopum6uyfwYCZqkJzcfqv-gajJFNvH3bbklz_0-coI73U_u13Z0j (accessed 2025-11-12).

Related to this article

PFAS spiking experiments in bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris)
Atomic Perspectives
This Atomic Perspectives column explains how high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry (HR-CS-GFMAS) quantifies extractable organic fluorine (EOF) as a PFAS sum parameter, complementing LC-MS/MS target analysis, with applications to German river sediments, bean plants, and fluorinated polymer sealing materials.
2026 SciX Conference Summary ©   Bos Amico -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
SciX 2026, the annual conference presented by the Federation of Analytical Chemistry and Spectroscopy Societies (FACSS), ran October 4–9, 2026, at the Nugget Casino Resort in Sparks, Nevada. The program spanned atomic and molecular spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, chemometrics, and bioanalysis. This report follows the meeting day by day, from Monday's clinical Raman plenaries to Friday's closing talks, drawing on the online program and Spectroscopy coverage of award winners, highlighting efforts to move Raman, SERS, LIBS, and single-particle ICP-MS toward clinical, environmental, and field use.
NIR Spectroscopy of the Brain and Other Complex Analyses, ©   Navaporn  -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
Near-infrared spectroscopy has quietly stopped being a niche calibration exercise and started acting like an autonomous diagnostic partner, reading consciousness in an injured brain, steering a fermenter without a human hand, and hunting invisible plastic in a glass of water. The tool chemists once used to check moisture in grain is now fusing with artificial intelligence to make decisions no spectrometer could make alone.
FACSS 2026 Award Interviews ©  Erin -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
Eight FACSS award winners at SciX 2026, One LIBS trailblazer. Forty-eight questions. And not one of them is a softball. Award season in spectroscopy usually means polite applause, a plaque, and a photo. We're not completely interested only in the award sessions. The eight scientists honored at SciX 2026 in Sparks, Nevada, along with LIBS researcher Alessandro De Giacomo, are pushing Raman into operating rooms, flying LIBS on drones, reading chemistry off Mars, and tracing toxic metals downwind of industrial sites. Their work makes big claims. In the coming days, Spectroscopy will sit down with eight of these researchers and ask whether those claims hold up. The interviews that follow won't just celebrate. They'll press on the gaps between simulation and experiment, between the lab bench and the clinic, and between a clever paper and an instrument someone will actually buy and use.