SPEC PerkinElmer 10.13
|Articles|February 11, 2011

Application Notebook

  • Application Notebook-02-11-2011
  • Volume 0
  • Issue 0

Generating Purge Gas for FT-IR Spectroscopy

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometers provide spectra in less time than scanning systems, but water vapor and/or CO2 in the sample chamber leads to additional peaks that may obscure important information. These interferences can be eliminated by sealing the sample chamber and purging with dry, CO2 free air (purge gas) or nitrogen for a short period of time.

Kim Myers, Parker Hannifin Filtration and Separation Division

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometers provide spectra in less time than scanning systems, but water vapor and/or CO2 in the sample chamber leads to additional peaks that may obscure important information. These interferences can be eliminated by sealing the sample chamber and purging with dry, CO2 free air (purge gas) or nitrogen for a short period of time.

While dry CO2 free air (nitrogen) can be obtained from tanks and a desiccator, the use of an in-house generator that ports purge gas directly to the FT-IR is safer, more reliable, convenient, economical, and is more energy efficient than the use of tanks. Figure 1 shows a spectrum before and after purging the sample chamber using an in-house generator (Parker Balston Model 75-45NA, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Haverhill, Massachusetts).

In-house Generation of Purge Gas

A purge gas generator produces dry CO2 free air from compressed air using a coalescing filter element to remove particulate matter (dust, pump oil, and water particles), a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) system containing molecular sieves to remove the non-desired components of the input air and a high efficiency filter to remove particulate matter in the purge gas that may have been carried over from the molecular sieves. Systems are available to provide up to 216 scfh (102 lpm).

Benefits of an In-house Generator

An in-house purge gas generator provides the following benefits:

Greater Safety — A small amount of gas is present at low pressure and is ported directly to the spectrometer (a gas tank may have a pressure > 2000 psi). A gas tank can become a guided missile if the valve is compromised, leading to the possibility of injury or damage during transportation and installation.

Convenience — The total cost of operation of the generator is extremely low, the raw materials are laboratory air and electricity and many users find that the payback for an in-house system is a year or less. The cost for using tank gas tanks includes the actual cost of the tank, the value of the time to change tanks, and related activities. The overall cost of tanks depends on a broad range of local parameters and the amount of gas that is used; considerable savings can be obtained from the use of an in-house purge gas generator.

Environmental Benefits — The energy requirements for an in-house purge gas generator is quite low. In contrast, when tanks are used, the gas is purified and compressed to 2000 psi. Once the tanks are filled, they must be transported to the end user's site and the empty tanks must be returned to the supplier.

The spectra comparison in Figure 1 illustrates that a Parker Balston FT-IR Purge Gas Generator allows an FT-IR to be purged at a much higher flow rate than is practical with nitrogen. The sample chamber purged by the Parker Balston unit if free of CO2 and water faster than the sample chamber purged by nitrogen.

Figure 1: A rapid purge of an FT-IR sample chamber using an in-house generator removes extraneous peaks.

Parker Hannifin Corporation Filtration and Separation Division

242 Neck Road, P.O. Box 8223, Haverhill MA 01835

tel. (800) 343-4048 or (978) 858-0505, fax (978) 556-7501 Website: www.labgasgenerators.com


Related to this article

Sparks near Reno Nevada – Site of 2026 SciX Conference ©   DTM Media  -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
Wednesday's program at SciX 2026 kept returning to one question: can spectroscopy perform outside the controlled laboratory? Speakers took surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), mid-infrared photonics, chemometrics, and fluorescence excitation–emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy into clinics, food plants, reactor coolant loops, brine fields, and drinking water supplies.
Nancy Pleshko (left) is a Laura H. Carnell Professor Emerita in Temple University's Department of Bioengineering. Petra A. Baylin (right) is a research assistant in the Tissue Imaging and Spectroscopy Lab at Temple University. Photo Credits: © Nancy Pleshko and Petra Baylin
As part of our coverage of the SciX 2026 Conference, Nancy Pleshko and Petra Baylin of Temple University sat down with Spectroscopy to talk about their recent study, explaining how Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) imaging of ultra-high weight molecular polyethylene (UHMWPE) implants permits oxidation evaluation throughout the sample yielding insight into failure.
NIR Spectroscopy of the Brain and Other Complex Analyses, ©   Navaporn  -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
Near-infrared spectroscopy has quietly stopped being a niche calibration exercise and started acting like an autonomous diagnostic partner, reading consciousness in an injured brain, steering a fermenter without a human hand, and hunting invisible plastic in a glass of water. The tool chemists once used to check moisture in grain is now fusing with artificial intelligence to make decisions no spectrometer could make alone.
FACSS 2026 Award Interviews ©  Erin -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
Eight FACSS award winners at SciX 2026, One LIBS trailblazer. Forty-eight questions. And not one of them is a softball. Award season in spectroscopy usually means polite applause, a plaque, and a photo. We're not completely interested only in the award sessions. The eight scientists honored at SciX 2026 in Sparks, Nevada, along with LIBS researcher Alessandro De Giacomo, are pushing Raman into operating rooms, flying LIBS on drones, reading chemistry off Mars, and tracing toxic metals downwind of industrial sites. Their work makes big claims. In the coming days, Spectroscopy will sit down with eight of these researchers and ask whether those claims hold up. The interviews that follow won't just celebrate. They'll press on the gaps between simulation and experiment, between the lab bench and the clinic, and between a clever paper and an instrument someone will actually buy and use.
Spectral Frontiers: Past the Diffraction Limit (FT-IR Spectroscopy)
Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, long the workhorse of molecular fingerprinting, is being reinvented by photothermal detection schemes and quantum cascade laser (QCL) sources that push spatial resolution and analysis speed far beyond classical dispersive and interferometric limits. New instrumentation such as optical photothermal infrared (O-PTIR) microscopy and laser direct infrared (LDIR) chemical imaging is enabling sub-micron, label-free chemical mapping of biological, environmental, and pharmaceutical samples. This article reviews the latest FT-IR-adjacent technologies, recent patents, and research driving the field, featuring perspectives from the scientists and instrument developers advancing the technique.