|Articles|May 1, 2010

Spectroscopy

  • Spectroscopy-05-01-2010
  • Volume 0
  • Issue 0

Market Profile: Triple Quadrupole GC–MS

Until recently, triple-quadrupole gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) has been a relatively obscure segment of the GC–MS market. However, it is now exploding into a major market segment. New entrants and recent instrument introductions indicate that there has been a significant unmet need in the GC–MS market for such capabilities.

Until recently, triple-quadrupole gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) has been a relatively obscure segment of the GC–MS market. However, it is now exploding into a major market segment. New entrants and recent instrument introductions indicate that there has been a significant unmet need in the GC–MS market for such capabilities.

While GC–MS is advantageous for analyzing compounds that are fairly volatile, having to perform quantitative applications with it generally required single ion monitoring methods on single-quadrupole machines. Selected reaction monitoring, sometimes referred to as multiple reaction monitoring, is more accurate for quantitation, but requires the MS-MS capabilities of tandem-quadrupole systems, which has led laboratories to adopt LC–MS-MS techniques instead.

One of the first widely commercialized triple-quadrupole GC–MS systems came from Waters in 2002, and was based upon the company's triple-quadrupole LC–MS system. Varian also entered the triple-quadrupole GC–MS market in 2002 with a system that could be configured either as a single or triple quadrupole, and used as either an LC–MS or GC–MS system. More recently, Thermo Scientific entered the fray by way of adapting its triple-quadrupole LC–MS system for GC–MS. Agilent's introduction of a triple-quadrupole GC–MS system at the end of 2008 that was designed from the ground up for GC–MS, rather than adapted from an LC–MS design, also had an impact.

The market for triple-quadrupole GC–MS has grown from less than $15 million in 2007 to more than $40 million in 2009, despite the global recession. As food, environmental, and many biological laboratories adopt triple-quadrupole GC–MS for quantitative applications, annual growth in demand should remain well into the double-digits for a number of years to come.

The foregoing data were based upon SDi's market analysis and perspectives report: Global Assessment Report, 10.5th Edition: The Laboratory Life Science and Analytical Instrument Industry, August 2009. For more information, contact Stuart Press, Vice President – Strategic Analysis, Strategic Directions International, Inc., www.strategic-directions.com.


Related to this article

Highlights from What’s Nu October 2026
In this Q&A, we recap the October edition of “What’s Nu,” which covered topics such as how novel spectroscopic and analytical methods are transforming environmental monitoring, medical treatment, and accessibility in scientific research.
Education distance learning, e-learning, and online learning are all types of personal development. | Image Credit: © ipuwadol - stock.adobe.com
In this segment of our SciX interview with Kevin Wilkinson, a professor of environmental chemistry at the Université de Montréal, discusses extending lead isotope work to greater distances and explains why graduate students need adaptability, critical judgment, and coding skills more than expertise in any single instrument.
Atoms Don't Lie–The Remaking of Atomic Spectroscopy, © Hallie -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
Atomic spectroscopy has quietly gone from counting elements in bulk to counting single nanoparticles, imaging tissue at the micrometer scale, and reading Martian rocks from several meters away. The instruments got smaller, the software got smarter, and the questions they can now answer got a lot more interesting.