
- Application Notebook-09-03-2015
- Issue 0
Cost Savings Comparison: CVAA Versus Direct Mercury Analysis
The majority of environmental laboratories are currently using traditional techniques like cold vapor atomic absorption to analyze samples for mercury content.
The majority of environmental laboratories are currently using traditional techniques like cold vapor atomic absorption to analyze samples for mercury content. However, with the cost of reagents and their disposal continually rising it is important for laboratories to find more cost effective ways to do mercury analysis.
With this in mind, Milestone has created a cost comparison of 250 soil samples to show the benefits of using our DMA-80 Direct Mercury Analyzer. One batch was analyzed with EPA Method 7471 B-Mercury in Solid or Semi-Solid Waste (Manual Cold Vapor Technique), while a second batch was analyzed by Milestone's DMA-80 Direct Mercury Analyzer.
Figure 1: The Milestone DMA-80 Mercury Analyzer: Innovation Delivered.
The DMA-80 offers a 74% cost savings and over 19 h of labor savings compared to CVAA.
*Labor Cost @ $20/h
Learn more or request an onsite demonstration:
Milestone, Inc.
25 Controls Drive, Shelton, CT 06484
tel. (866) 995-5100, fax (203) 925-4241
Website:
Articles in this issue
almost 11 years ago
Miniature 60 kV, 1000 μA 12 W X-ray Sourcealmost 11 years ago
Applications in Gemology Using the TSI LIBS Desktop Analyzeralmost 11 years ago
Two Excitation Wavelengths Are Better than Onealmost 11 years ago
Spectroscopy’s New Role in Document Securityalmost 11 years ago
Analysis of Agricultural Soils and Plant Materialsalmost 11 years ago
Performance Characteristics of a PFA Cyclonic Spray Chamber with HR ICP-MSalmost 11 years ago
Optimized Grazing Angle Ge-ATR of Monolayers and Thin Films on Sialmost 11 years ago
Infrared Transmission Measurements of Diffuse Samplesalmost 11 years ago
Spectrally Highly-Resolved Automated Raman Imaging