
- Application Notebook-09-03-2015
- Issue 0
Cost Savings Comparison: CVAA Versus Direct Mercury Analysis
The majority of environmental laboratories are currently using traditional techniques like cold vapor atomic absorption to analyze samples for mercury content.
The majority of environmental laboratories are currently using traditional techniques like cold vapor atomic absorption to analyze samples for mercury content. However, with the cost of reagents and their disposal continually rising it is important for laboratories to find more cost effective ways to do mercury analysis.
With this in mind, Milestone has created a cost comparison of 250 soil samples to show the benefits of using our DMA-80 Direct Mercury Analyzer. One batch was analyzed with EPA Method 7471 B-Mercury in Solid or Semi-Solid Waste (Manual Cold Vapor Technique), while a second batch was analyzed by Milestone's DMA-80 Direct Mercury Analyzer.
Figure 1: The Milestone DMA-80 Mercury Analyzer: Innovation Delivered.
The DMA-80 offers a 74% cost savings and over 19 h of labor savings compared to CVAA.
*Labor Cost @ $20/h
Learn more or request an onsite demonstration:
Milestone, Inc.
25 Controls Drive, Shelton, CT 06484
tel. (866) 995-5100, fax (203) 925-4241
Website:
Articles in this issue
about 10 years ago
Miniature 60 kV, 1000 μA 12 W X-ray Sourceabout 10 years ago
Applications in Gemology Using the TSI LIBS Desktop Analyzerabout 10 years ago
Two Excitation Wavelengths Are Better than Oneabout 10 years ago
Spectroscopy’s New Role in Document Securityabout 10 years ago
Analysis of Agricultural Soils and Plant Materialsabout 10 years ago
Optimized Grazing Angle Ge-ATR of Monolayers and Thin Films on Siabout 10 years ago
Infrared Transmission Measurements of Diffuse Samplesabout 10 years ago
Spectrally Highly-Resolved Automated Raman ImagingNewsletter
Get essential updates on the latest spectroscopy technologies, regulatory standards, and best practices—subscribe today to Spectroscopy.
