|Articles|February 1, 2012

Application Notebook

  • Application Notebook-02-01-2012
  • Volume 0
  • Issue 0

Wire Grid Polarizer – 10% Improvement in PBS Efficiency

Author(s)Moxtek

This technical brief compares imaging needs and how Moxtek is improving its products. It explains how competing technologies in LCoS projectors compare in terms of brightness, performance, durability and reliability.

The ProFlux® Nanowire® polarizer technology offers a reliable, highly durable solution to high quality LCoS display technology with a perfect polarization match to the LC imager. Recent improvements in the polarizing beam splitter (PBS) technology enable a 10% improvement in efficiency.

This technical brief compares imaging needs and how Moxtek is improving its products. It explains how competing technologies in LCoS projectors compare in terms of brightness, performance, durability and reliability.

PBS Efficiency

Efficiency (Tp*Rs) for a polarizing beamsplitter is a measure of how perfectly a polarizer converts randomly polarized light into (reflected) s and (transmitted) p polarized light. If all of the light is converted, then the beamsplitter would be 100% efficient. In reality, some of the light is absorbed, some 's' is transmitted and some 'p' is reflected, reducing the efficiency.

The Moxtek standard PBS is typically 81% efficient at 550 nm wavelength. Recently, with improved manufacturing techniques and new wire grid technology, this efficiency has been dramatically improved.

Figure 1: Beamsplitter efficiency comparison (typical).

Figure 1 shows the improvement in efficiency for the Moxtek High Efficiency PBS (HEPBS) versus standard PBS. This represents a 10% improvement and is greater than 89% efficiency at 550 nm wavelength.

Comparison of Other Technologies

In addition to high efficiency, ProFlux Nanowire® grids offer many other benefits. Table I, "Comparison of Technologies," shows a comparison of Nanowire® grid polarizers, stretched polymer absorbing films (dichroic polarizers), and Brewster's angle polarizers (MacNeille cubes).

Table I: Comparison of technologies

Flatter response of ProFlux across both wavelength and angle creates a more uniform picture from the projector. The wide acceptance angle allows for small f/# optical designs while maintaining color and contrast uniformity. ProFlux offers an excellent, flat response to rotation in both axes, an indication of its superior performance with skew ray polarization. Contrastingly, dichroic sheet depolarization reduces the ability to maintain high polarization contrast in optical systems.

The Profulx beam splitter shows no total internal reflection cutoff, and may be used at a much smaller f/# than the MacNielle PBS, retaining high contrast.

Figure 2: AOI comparison for ProFlux wire grid and dichroic polarizers.

An important advantage of the ProFlux PBS over a MacNeille cube is the direction of polarization. A cube polarizes in a direction defined by the orientation of the incoming ray, that is, by the plane of incidence. Because the plane of incidence changes as the skew ray direction changes, uniform polarization over a large cone is impossible for a standalone cube PBS.

ProFlux PBS, on the other hand, polarizes relative to the direction of the wire grid structure. Rays along the principal axis, as well as skew rays, are all polarized in the same direction. This has been called a Cartesian polarizer and is a critical quality for good PBS polarization. Using ProFlux PBS polarizers creates improved full screen performance by providing uniform polarization brightness and contrast across the entire angular aperture at the PBS.

Moxtek

452 West 1260 North, Orem, UT 84057

tel. (800) 758-3110

Email: [email protected]; Website: www.moxtek.com


Related to this article

Brandon E. Boor is the Dr. Margery E. Hoffman Associate Professor in the Lyles School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Purdue University. | Photo Credit: © Brandon Boor.
In the second part of our interview with Brandon Boor of Purdue University, he discusses how his team controls experimental variables during cleaning experiments in order to obtain interpretable data.
Scientist With Portable Spectrometer in Natural Field Setting ©  By Tika -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
The bulky bench-top NIR spectrometer is quietly being dismantled and rebuilt as a wafer-scale photonic chip, a self-calibrating algorithm, and a sensor small enough to ride in a shirt pocket. What once demanded a grating, a moving mirror, and a climate-controlled lab now fits inside a handheld module, a bioreactor probe, or a drone payload, and it increasingly figures out what it is looking at on its own.
Sizing Up the Nanoscale: Measuring Nanocluster Aerosol in Indoor Air
In the first part of a multi-part Q&A, Brandon Boor, the Dr. Margery E. Hoffman Associate Professor in the Lyles School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Purdue University, describes the instrumentation and methodology behind measuring nanoparticle size distributions at the nanocluster scale (1–3 nm) and outlines the technical challenges of acquiring reliable, real-time data at these dimensions.
Human body wireframe on glowing platform undergoing futuristic body scan. © sergray(noAIelemens) -chronicles-stock.adobe.com
Jurgen Popp, Thomas Mayerhofer, and colleagues at Leibniz IPHT and Friedrich Schiller University Jena introduce the Personalized Optical Digital Twin (PODT), a Photonics21 contribution to Europe's Virtual Human Twin ecosystem that connects molecular photonics—Raman blood analysis, coherent Raman tissue imaging, and multimodal endomicroscopy—with longitudinal physiology and clinical data. Drawing on the published multicenter INTELLIGENCE trials, the authors argue that technical feasibility and clinical utility must be evaluated separately as the field moves toward Europe's FP10 research agenda.