Ametek

Demonstration of the advantages of using the Orbis micro-XRF elemental analyzer rather than other analysis techniques to perform elemental analysis through a plastic barrier and/or at atmospheric pressure.

Most elemental analysis techniques require a sample to be exposed to the excitation source and/or placed under vacuum. For example, ICP-MS and atomic absorption (AA) require sample digestion or ablation and then exposure to the excitation source, while SEM-EDS requires exposure of the sample to the electron beam while under, at least, low vacuum. There are certain situations where it is highly desirable to leave the sample in a plastic barrier bag or analyze the sample at atmospheric pressure. For example, the analyst could be concerned about contamination from toxic, corrosive, or radioactive samples or may need to prevent environmental contamination of the sample. For micro-spot elemental analysis, the Orbis micro-XRF spectrometer is unique as an elemental analysis tool in that the analysis can be done through a plastic bag and, if necessary, at atmospheric pressure.  

Sample must be removed from barrier bag for analysis via electron beam

 Wet sample outgassing and particle debris will put the SEM column at risk for contamination

Sample must be removed from barrier bag for analysis 

Radioactively decaying materials can contaminate the equipment

In Comparison, Orbis Micro-XRF  Analysis Offers an Attractive Alternative

Analysis can be performed through a plastic barrier bag and at atmospheric pressure, facilitating the analysis of powders and slurries

Sample targeting through the barrier bag is simple and accurate with the perpendicular analysis geometry provided by the Orbis  system

Analysis can be made on small spots to measure inclusions and    defects

Both qualitative and quantitative analysis is possible and  additional features such as primary beam filters extend the  analytical detection limits

Micro-XRF is performed using X-rays as the exciting source with fluoresced X-rays characteristic of the elements present as the signal. Lighter elements (such as Na–Ar) fluoresce lower energy X-rays, which are more readily absorbed or scattered while traveling through a plastic barrier or through air at atmospheric pressure. Heavier elements fluoresce higher energy X-rays which experience minimal attenuation while traversing typical plastic barrier materials or the atmospheric path to the detector. Hence, where it is desirable to keep a sample in a plastic containment bag and/or analyze the sample at atmospheric pressure, micro-XRF can provide valuable elemental analysis data even if there is a trade-off on the detection limits of lighter elements. 

The following analytical results include: a uranium rich glass, a mining standard powder, and moon rock, all performed under varying chamber pressure and all contained using plastic bags. The conditions for each sample are briefly described. In all the samples there is signal attenuation at the lighter emissions (<4 keV) while very little at the higher emissions. 

Figure 1 shows three spectra with variation in the plastic bagging. The measured concentrations of uranium were approximately 1.68 wt% using the exposed sample in air. Red is the uranium glass exposed with no barrier, blue enclosed in a single 50 µm bag, and green enclosed in two layers of 50 µm bag, for a total barrier of 100 µm. Above 4 keV there is little signal attenuation; however, below 4 keV there is distinguishable attenuation. 

Figure 1: Analysis results for a uranium glass sample. Red - with no barrier; blue - enclosed in a single 50 Âµm bag; green - enclosed in two layers of 50 Âµm bag.			

Figure 2 shows a mining sample powder of Canmet DH-1, which has a known concentration of uranium at 0.26 wt% compared with a measured concentration in the previous glass sample of 1.68 wt%. Here the red line represents the powder contained within a thinner Mylar envelope, blue within a thicker 50 µm plastic bag, and green the same 50 µm sample bag using a rhodium primary beam filter which improves lower limits of detection for the uranium X-ray lines. Both the Mylar and blue 50 µm plastic bag samples were analyzed without a filter in place. By comparing the blue and green spectra it is evident that filtering improves the peak to background for the U(Lα) line allowing for improved detection limits while using the thicker barrier plastic. 

Figure 2: Analysis results for a Canmet DH-1 sample. Red - enclosed in thin Mylar envelope; blue - enclosed in 50 Âµm plastic bag; green - enclosed in 50 Âµm plastic bag using rhodium primary beam filter.			

Figure 3 shows a lunar rock composed of transition elements rather than higher energy actinides. The data is represented by elemental maps instead of spectral plots. Starting from the left, these are the results from an uncontained sample, followed by samples contained with 50.8 µm nylon, 50.8 µm Teflon, and 127 µm Teflon containment bagging with analysis done in vacuum. The higher intensity color indicates stronger signal intensity with less signal absorption by the barrier material. Even using the higher density Teflon barrier material in comparison to the nylon, it is possible to efficiently analyze lower energy transition elements with the barrier in place. The goal in this case was to evaluate the impact of using increasingly stronger, gas tight containment bags on the elemental analysis via micro-XRF. 

Figure 3: Analysis results for lunar rock with data represented by elemental maps.			

The Orbis micro-XRF spectrometer has been used to provide valuable elemental analyses on samples contained within a barrier bag under atmospheric pressure and vacuum. Two capabilities have been shown here, single point analysis and elemental mapping. Where analysis of inclusions and defects or higher resolution mapping is of interest, the ultra-high intensity 30 µm polycapillary optic is particularly useful. Therefore, the Orbis PC configuration with this type of optic is recommended for this type of work. The standard hardware suite includes the primary beam energy filters used here for improved detection limits over limited spectral ranges as well as the automated stage for sample positioning and mapping. The Orbis can also be configured with two larger spot collimators along with the polycapillary optic for sample measurements more suited to a larger spot analysis. 

Articles

Elemental Analysis Through a Plastic Barrier

Wet sample outgassing and particle debris will put the SEM  column at risk for contamination

In Comparison, Orbis Micro-XRF Analysis Offers an Attractive Alternative

Analysis can be made on small spots to measure inclusions and   defects

Micro-XRF is performed using X-rays as the exciting source with fluoresced X-rays characteristic of the elements present as the signal. Lighter elements (e.g. Na – Ar) fluoresce lower energy X-rays, which are more readily absorbed or scattered while traveling through a plastic barrier or through air at atmospheric pressure. Heavier elements fluoresce higher energy X-rays which experience minimal attenuation while traversing typical plastic barrier materials or the atmospheric path to the detector. Hence, where it is desirable to keep a sample in a plastic containment bag and/or analyze the sample at atmospheric pressure, micro-XRF can provide valuable elemental analysis data even if there is a trade-off on the detection limits of lighter elements. 

Figure 1 shows three spectra with variation in the plastic bagging. The measured concentrations of uranium were approximately 1.68 wt% using the exposed sample in air. Red is the uranium glass exposed with no barrier, blue enclosed in a single 50 μm bag, and green enclosed in two layers of 50 μm bag, for a total barrier of 100 μm. Above 4 keV there is little signal attenuation; however, below 4 keV there is distinguishable attenuation.  

Figure 1: Analysis results for a uranium glass sample. Red - with no barrier; blue - enclosed in a single 50 Î¼m bag; green - enclosed in two layers of 50 Î¼m bag.			

Figure 2 shows a mining sample powder of Canmet DH-1, which has a known concentration of uranium at 0.26 wt% compared with a measured concentration in the previous glass sample of 1.68 wt%. Here the red line represents the powder contained within a thinner Mylar envelope, blue within a thicker 50 μm plastic bag, and green the same 50 μm sample bag using a rhodium primary beam filter which improves lower limits of detection for the uranium X-ray lines. Both the Mylar and blue 50 μm plastic bag samples were analyzed without a filter in place. By comparing the blue and green spectra it is evident that filtering improves the peak to background for the U(Lα) line allowing for improved detection limits while using the thicker barrier plastic.  

Figure 2: Analysis results for a Canmet DH-1 sample. Red - enclosed in thin Mylar envelope; blue - enclosed in 50 Î¼m plastic bag; green - enclosed in 50 Î¼m plastic bag using rhodium primary beam filter.			

Figure 3 shows a lunar rock composed of transition elements rather than higher energy actinides. The data is represented by elemental maps instead of spectral plots. Starting from the left, these are the results from an uncontained sample, followed by samples contained with 50.8 μm nylon, 50.8 μm Teflon, and 127 μm Teflon containment bagging with analysis done in vacuum. The higher intensity color indicates stronger signal intensity with less signal absorption by the barrier material. Even using the higher density Teflon barrier material in comparison to the nylon, it is possible to efficiently analyze lower energy transition elements with the barrier in place. The goal in this case was to evaluate the impact of using increasingly stronger, gas tight containment bags on the elemental analysis via micro-XRF.  

The Orbis micro-XRF spectrometer has been used to provide valuable elemental analyses on samples contained within a barrier bag under atmospheric pressure and vacuum. Two capabilities have been shown here, single point analysis and elemental mapping. Where analysis of inclusions and defects or higher resolution mapping is of interest, the ultra-high intensity 30 μm polycapillary optic is particularly useful. Therefore, the Orbis PC configuration with this type of optic is recommended for this type of work. The standard hardware suite includes the primary beam energy filters used here for improved detection limits over limited spectral ranges as well as the automated stage for sample positioning and mapping. The Orbis can also be configured with two larger spot collimators along with the polycapillary optic for sample measurements more suited to a larger spot analysis.  

tel. (201) 529-4880, fax (201) 529-3156  