SPEC PerkinElmer 10.13
News|Videos|October 12, 2026

Beyond the Plasma: Alessandro De Giacomo on Laser–Matter Interaction and Nanoparticle Tagging

At SciX 2026, Alessandro De Giacomo explains why laser–matter interaction deserves more attention and how nanoparticle size forces a trade-off between sensitivity and practical tagging.

In an interview with Spectroscopy Magazine at SciX 2026, which took place in Sparks, Nevada, Alessandro De Giacomo, a professor at the University of Bari Aldo Moro in Italy and a longtime editorial board member of Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, shared his perspective on where gaps remain in the understanding of laser-induced plasmas and how nanoparticle size shapes the design of tagging-based analyses.1

According to De Giacomo, the scientific community has developed a strong grasp of the plasma itself. What remains less understood, he said, is the laser–matter interaction that initiates the process and the mechanism by which material is ejected from the sample. He emphasized that the system is not homogeneous. Instead, it is heterogeneous, with a gas plasma phase coexisting and interacting with a condensed phase throughout the plasma’s evolution. This interplay, he noted, has received far less attention than conventional plasma characteristics, and he argued that it deserves greater focus from the research community going forward.

De Giacomo also addressed the role of nanoparticle size in analytical performance. Smaller nanoparticles, he explained, vaporize with very high efficiency, which means they largely become emitters. Larger nanoparticles, however, contain more atoms and therefore more potential emitters, making them more advantageous where sensitivity is concerned.

That advantage comes with constraints when nanoparticles are used as tags for biological targets. De Giacomo pointed to exosomes as an example: these particles can measure around 100 nanometers or even smaller, so the size of the tag itself can physically interfere with the target. Researchers must therefore select a nanoparticle that can effectively tag the system of interest without that interference. The challenge grows in multiplex analysis, where several tags are applied at once; in those cases, large nanoparticles are not a practical option.

Ultimately, De Giacomo described nanoparticle selection as a balancing act. The right choice depends on the type of tagging being performed, weighing the sensitivity gains offered by larger particles against the practical limits imposed by the size of the target and by the number of tags the analysis requires.

Reference

(1) De Giacomo, A.; Workman, J., Jr.; Wetzel, W. Alessandro De Giacomo on LIBS, Plasma Physics, and Nanoparticle Size. Spectroscopy Online, 2026. https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/alessandro-de-giacomo-on-libs-plasma-physics-and-nanoparticle-size (accessed October 12, 2026).


Related to this article

Nancy Pleshko (left) is a Laura H. Carnell Professor Emerita in Temple University's Department of Bioengineering. Petra A. Baylin (right) is a research assistant in the Tissue Imaging and Spectroscopy Lab at Temple University. Photo Credits: © Nancy Pleshko and Petra Baylin
As part of our coverage of the SciX 2026 Conference, Nancy Pleshko and Petra Baylin of Temple University sat down with Spectroscopy to talk about their recent study, explaining how Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) imaging of ultra-high weight molecular polyethylene (UHMWPE) implants permits oxidation evaluation throughout the sample yielding insight into failure.